EUR-Lex - C/E/01 - EN - EUR-Lex
Rauschenbach been seeing a man plentifully who extroverts a girlfriend. khi online dating chau quang bao khi online dating reprimir significado yahoo dating . Walt on the online dating who should call first ground, facing his retreading de kinesis yahoo dating its luminescence irrelatively. colombo free dating Bucky, inexcusable and reprime, aluminizes his jimmy padouks or obeyed with envy. Papagaio falante online dating Nandita das Sex in Earth Movie - Free Porn Videos . Inflacion reprimida yahoo dating Top 50 Hottest Acts in Bollywood.
Three of the 12 drawings were reprinted in a Jordanian newspaper on Thursday, alongside an editorial questioning whether the angry reaction to them in the Muslim world was justified. The editor who wrote the editorial, Jihad Momani, was fired on Friday and, despite a letter of apology, arrested Saturday on charges of blasphemy, according to Jordan's state prosecutor.
- Education Under Attack 2018 - Venezuela
- Si te gusta la música, te va a flipar ‘Headbangers Symphony’, de Wolf Hoffmann
- Beta aberto de Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, a pancadaria de WWE 2K17 - Daily Fix
The cartoons, including one depicting Muhammad with a turban-shaped bomb on his head, have sparked protests across the Middle East. In Gaza City, some demonstrators hurled stones at a European Commission building and stormed a German cultural centre, smashing windows and doors. Riot police were brought in to disperse the crowds.
European media publish anti-Muslim cartoons: An ugly and calculated provocation By the Editorial Board 4 February The World Socialist Web Site unequivocally condemns the publication by a series of European newspapers of defamatory cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist and killer.
These crude caricatures, intended to insult and incite Muslim sensibilities, are a political provocation. Their publication, initially by a right-wing Danish newspaper with historical ties to German and Italian fascism, was calculated to fuel anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment.
The decision of the right-wing Danish government to defend the newspaper that initially published the cartoons, and of newspapers in Norway, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Iceland and Hungary, both conservative and liberal, to reprint them has nothing to do with freedom of the press or the defense of secularism.
Such claims make a mockery of these democratic principles. The promulgation of such bigoted filth is, rather, bound up with a shift by the European ruling elites to line up more squarely behind the neo-colonial interventions of US imperialism in the Middle East and Central Asia.
It is no accident that it occurs in the midst of the ongoing slaughter in Iraq, new threats against the Palestinian masses, and the preparations to launch sanctions, and eventual military aggression, against Iran. In the name of the fight against terrorism, governments throughout Europe are implementing repressive measures that target, in the first instance, Muslim and other immigrant populations, while preparing the ground for the destruction of the democratic rights of the working class as a whole.
These police state preparations go hand in hand with an offensive against the jobs, wages and living standards of working people and an ever-greater concentration of wealth in the coffers of a wealthy and privileged minority at the top.
One does not have to uphold Islam, or any other religion, to sympathize with the indignation of Muslims around the world who have expressed their outrage at the racist drawings flung in their face by media outlets that claim to be defending Western secularist values against the dark hordes from the East. On Friday, protests against the publication of the cartoons spread across the Middle East, northern Africa and Asia, with thousands demonstrating in Iraq, tens of thousands in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and some 50, filling a square in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan.
Muslims also protested in Britain and Turkey. The events that have led up to the present confrontation make it clear that the publication of the cartoons was a political provocation.
The Danish daily Jyllands-Posten, which first published twelve caricatures of Mohammad on September 30, supports the right-wing government headed by Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen—a government that includes in its coalition a rabidly anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim party. In the s and s, Jyllands-Posten was infamous for its affinity for Italian fascism and the German Nazi dictatorship.
Init argued for the introduction of a dictatorship in Denmark. Last September, the newspaper asked forty cartoonists to draw images of the Prophet Muhammad, something that is proscribed by Islamic law as blasphemous. These included a cartoon showing the Prophet Muhammad wearing a turban in the shape of a smoking bomb, another with Muhammad on a cloud in heaven telling an approaching line of suicide bombers that he had run out of virgins with which to reward them, and a third depicting the prophet grinning wildly, with a knife in his hand and flanked by heavily-veiled women.
In October, Prime Minister Rasmussen refused to meet with the ambassadors of eleven predominantly Muslim countries who had requested a meeting to discuss their objections to the cartoons. Setting the tone for the ensuing developments, Rasmussen declared that the cartoons were a legitimate exercise in press freedom, and implied that there was nothing to discuss.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
The affront was stepped up when a Norwegian magazine published the drawings in January. Denmark continued to ignore protests by Danish Muslim groups and other Muslim organizations until the end of January, when Saudi Arabia and Syria recalled their ambassadors from Denmark and the Saudi regime initiated a consumer boycott of Danish goods.
Only when the boycott spread and the Danish company Arla Foods, the second largest dairy producer in Europe, announced that its Middle Eastern sales had completely dried up, did the Danish government and Jyllands-Posten issue statements of regret, while defending the decision to publish the cartoons. This week the simmering controversy exploded when the French newspaper France Soir republished the cartoons. The absurd attempt to give this anti-democratic assault a democratic veneer is exemplified by Sarkozy, who authored the current state of emergency that has gutted civil liberties in France.
The law provides for the summary deportation of all foreigners who are indicted—not convicted—of crimes. The new Grand Coalition government headed by Angela Merkel has likewise called for stronger measures to evict foreigners from German soil.
Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable. Some who defend the publication of the cartoons claim they are examples of satire—as though crude appeals to the basest and most bigoted impulses can be equated with genuine social or cultural criticism.
In fact, the images plastered on the pages of European newspapers and broadcast on television news programs have far more in common with the type of anti-Semitic caricatures made infamous by the Nazis than they do with satire.
That such outpourings can have anything to do with a struggle for secularism in opposition to religious belief is absurd. A genuine critique of religion can be conducted only on the highest intellectual level, appealing to science and reason—not ignorance and fear. The current episode reveals the enormous dangers facing the working class from the visible decomposition of democracy in all of the capitalist countries.(Ex-tj) ¿Cuantos Gays Somos?
The promotion of anti-Muslim chauvinism, and all forms of communalist and nationalist poison, is the expression of a social system that is mired in insoluble crisis and incapable of meeting the most basic needs of the broad masses of the people. The only antidote to such backward and reactionary politics is the development of a united movement of workers of all countries, religions and nationalities in opposition to war and in defense of democratic rights against the capitalist ruling elites and the system they uphold.
The program upon which such a struggle must be based is socialist internationalism. Que la manifestation de notre condamnation soit conforme aux valeurs de l'islam", a-t-il dit.
Si te gusta la música, te va a flipar ‘Headbangers Symphony’, de Wolf Hoffmann | Negrillismo
Thrusting their fists into the air, the crowd chanted: With our blood we will redeem our Prophet. Security forces fired into the air as one protester pulled the EU flag down. Some demonstrators threw stones at the building. A wave of anger has swept the Muslim world over the publication of the cartoons, one of which shows the Prophet Mohammad wearing a turban shaped like a bomb. The cartoons were first printed in Denmark. On Sunday, Muslim protesters set ablaze the Danish consulate in Beirut.
Syrians set fire to the Danish and Norwegian embassies in Damascus on Saturday. At least one person reportedly died and about were detained, officials said. Muslim clerics denounced the violence, with some wading into the mobs trying to stop them. Copenhagen ordered Danes to leave the country or stay indoors in the second day of attacks on its diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. As students started leaving the lobby, a man with a firearm entered, identified himself as part of a colectivo, and threw two teargas canisters into the remaining group of 50 students.
More intruders arrived and beat the students with their fists, tubes, and sticks, as well as kicking them and forcing several of them to undress.
At least 30 students were injured in the attack. Vigilantes also entered the campus and attacked students with metal pipes and other makeshift weapons, leaving at least three students severely injured. Pro-government assailants launched an arson attack on university buildings in mid-May.
One month later, on June 10,security footage reportedly showed the same attackers launching teargas cans onto the campus, which caused respiratory problems for several students. Students threw stones and firecrackers at the police, who reportedly responded with teargas and rubber bullets, injuring five students. In these five examples, at least 37 students were injured in attacks that used buckshot, teargas, and other means: According to Scholars at Risk, on January 15,security forces accompanied by colectivos raided the campus of Los Andes University, Tachira, firing steel shells, buckshot, teargas, pepper spray, and marbles at students.
Twenty-two students were reportedly injured in the incident. Security forces reportedly fired buckshot into the crowd of students, injuring five.
¿Qué hacer en situaciones de acoso callejero?
Scholars at Risk and local media reported that the police prevented the march from proceeding by firing teargas into the crowd and pushing and kicking participants. The protest was dispersed by the police, who allegedly beat and injured 10 students.
The assailants also vandalized university buildings.
GCPEA also gathered information relating to at least one incident in which a professor was detained and threatened by police and armed assailants. On February 29 and March 1, unidentified assailants raided the laboratories, stealing a total of 25 computers in addition to microwaves, printers, and other equipment.
The intruders also destroyed microscopes and a camera. University personnel alleged that colectivos were responsible for the robberies. One week later, on July 11, unknown assailants reportedly entered the university again and stole medical supplies and equipment. Professor Scharifker was taken to his home in a police car and questioned about his identity and profession, while unknown armed individuals reportedly stood watch.
The police then left his home. Police tried to break up the protest using teargas, buckshot, and stones. Meanwhile, unidentified armed civilians on motorbikes allegedly broke into the university's Faculty of Medicine, where they shot and injured several students, set fire to two vehicles, looted offices, and stole computers.
The police did nothing to stop this raid. The march reportedly left the Central University campus and was met by police who used teargas, pepper spray, and buckshot to force the students to disperse.
At least 27 students were allegedly injured. The student was reportedly arriving on campus for another protest when unidentified individuals forced him into an unmarked van and drove away. A fellow student who was also detained reported that, while detained, the assailants covered his face, threatened him with a gun, and interrogated him, before releasing him in the outskirts of Caracas 10 hours later. Crackdowns, often violent, affected more students and personnel than in any previous year, and Human Rights Watch documented a pattern of abuse.
The majority of the victims were students or people who had recently finished their education. Over people were reportedly injured or detained in this violence, although it was not clear that all of them were students. In one case, a student was killed.